Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 00:20:07 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: qroxana <qroxana@protonmail.com>, Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: epair(4) Message-ID: <86ms8zbz6w.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokvfuPUkXHWjc4SeU9JuiPvE-=_ff6S5FwVMWQ=v0GMnw@mail.gmail.com> (Adrian Chadd's message of "Sat, 19 Jul 2025 11:10:31 -0700") References: <20250515162552.9209B20E@slippy.cwsent.com> <20250515185919.87008219@slippy.cwsent.com> <45d0f49d-229b-46b4-af95-6e8c4c856661@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> <aCeXdxeeWQs_Sz77@ragweed.eden.le-fay.org> <932111f8-f5ca-46d1-9f66-983f80f6116b@protected-networks.net> <aCeeSQY-fMH7l3XS@ragweed.eden.le-fay.org> <aC5sfOtgG79EwIUZ@int21h> <8DCF0DAB-5EE5-4FEF-8CCC-1D7AF971BA8C@hausen.com> <aC-F7jAvS4so01jn@int21h> <kwPh8Ri_hyqUbykx8ICzBR9Fo4WROJqXrmNTEpS4WAM8ezvniLErlqWmHLtMNaHEcE_A716D26Wxfzpshs3M1R3Ifa2ltSRhC4tM8Ijdw_o=@protonmail.com> <CAJ-VmokvfuPUkXHWjc4SeU9JuiPvE-=_ff6S5FwVMWQ=v0GMnw@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> writes: > qroxana <qroxana@protonmail.com> writes: > > What's the best practice for setting up bridge0 on a NFS root > > system? [...] > That's an interesting problem that I don't think was even thought > about when bridge(4) was added to FreeBSD. [...] I /think/ the tftp > boot path configures the interface addressing via kernel APIs, and > we'll need to undo it and flip it to a bridge. This is not the only scenario where you might want to add a bridge to a configured system. I think it would be useful to have a setting that causes all of an interface's addresses and routes to be moved to the bridge when the interface is added to it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.orghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ms8zbz6w.fsf>