Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:16:37 -0700 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Like it or not, Theo has a point... freebsd is shipping export-restricted software in the core Message-ID: <86pqvnxbre.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <20101006215345.1a57c45c@gumby.homeunix.com> (RW's message of "Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:53:45 %2B0100") References: <86fwwjyurd.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20101006215345.1a57c45c@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "RW" == RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> writes: RW> It doesn't say approval is needed. It says that it's needed if it's RW> required by the appropriate agencies. In other words, it's needed if RW> it's needed. But doesn't this then shift the burden to every exporter, knowing or unknowing, willing or unwilling? Seems like an onerous burden. Is it well-documented? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86pqvnxbre.fsf>