Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:14:26 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency Message-ID: <86ps6g5759.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4617D2CE.1050502@root.org> (Nate Lawson's message of "Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:20:14 -0700") References: <460AE39B.4070706@root.org> <86odmcqylx.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200703291905.00192.pieter@degoeje.nl> <86k5wzq4vx.fsf@dwp.des.no> <86fy7nq4q1.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4617D2CE.1050502@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > Obviously, it's easier to do nothing than something. So here are some > options: > > 1. Add my patch -- if a server returns an error, I see no way it would > have changed the PWD. If you say "CD GARBAGE", what reasonable system > would return an error and change to some random dir? > > 2. Add an env variable (similar to FTP_PASSIVE_MODE, say > "FTP_SINGLE_CWD") which forces the current behavior. If not set, fetch > tries the multi-method first, falls back to the single-method on error. No. Thanks, DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ps6g5759.fsf>