Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:31:41 +0900 From: Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp> To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "make release" breakage - dokern.sh patch 2 Message-ID: <86y9zedlqq.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:08:26 -0700" <20001024130826.K17729@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20001024143644.A52958@bsdwins.com> <20001024121509.I17729@dragon.nuxi.com> <86zojudnr5.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp> <20001024130826.K17729@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:08:26 -0700, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > I vote for 'remove NFS away'. > > Yes, there are many people using NFS install, but it is site-specific. > And INET6 isn't site specific. It certainly is everywhere but maybe .jp. I think INET6 is a grobal and public feature, because there are some IPv6 servers. IPv6 networks (6bone) WORKS, and you can get full FreeBSD distribution via IPv6 network if you have connectibity to world-wide 6bone. Not site-specific, IPv6 servers open to the world. Again. There is no public NFS servers for distributing FreeBSD as I know. You can't get any FreeBSD, even if you sends NFS packets to the Internet. Can I and anybody access your favorite NFS servers? -- Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp> Dept. of Biological Sciences, Grad. School of Science, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y9zedlqq.wl>