Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 14:29:52 +0200 From: peter@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packet tagging Message-ID: <878v3obakf.fsf@deeperthought.bsdly.net> In-Reply-To: <1368097169.74234.YahooMailNeo@web162701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> (Nomad Esst's message of "Thu, 9 May 2013 03:59:29 -0700 (PDT)") References: <1368097169.74234.YahooMailNeo@web162701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nomad Esst <noname.esst@yahoo.com> writes: > Should the system act as a bridge in order to do the tagging or is it > (bridge) just used to do the tagging regardless of the system rule? You can tag packets on incoming and filter on the tags later in your ruleset in non-bridge configurations too. But of course bridges have their own tagging and filtering facilities that may be combined with PF features. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?878v3obakf.fsf>