Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:20:07 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: "Murray Stokely" <murray@stokely.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding <acronym> elements to wlan Handbook section Message-ID: <878wqnafso.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <2a7894eb0812101310v2123a452q26b0e07630e7f209@mail.gmail.com> (Murray Stokely's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:10:31 -0800") References: <871vwfn418.fsf@kobe.laptop> <2a7894eb0812101310v2123a452q26b0e07630e7f209@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:10:31 -0800, "Murray Stokely" <murray@stokely.org> wrote:
> Is the stylesheet now smart enough to only markup the first occurrence
> differently? I seem to recall these could get distracting if all
> instances of an acronym are replaced (either with hyperlinks to
> definition, or bold, or however we are currently rendering them).
All the instances of am <acronym> are rendered in HTML as
<acronym class="ACRONYM">FOO</acronym>
with the current DSSSL code. We don't color or otherwise reformat
either 'acronym' or '#acronym' in our current docbook.css stylesheet, so
they are not distracting if the patch goes in.
We might have to make DSSSL a bit smarter about what to send to the
output HTML text if we start colorizing acronyms in CSS though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?878wqnafso.fsf>