Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:10:23 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1 Message-ID: <87ad79jzxc.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com> (Jason Williams's message of "Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:36:40 -0800") References: <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-11-06T01:36:40Z, Jason Williams <jwilliams@courtesymortgage.com> wr= ites: > Just a quick question here. > > How stable is 5.1 for production servers? I switched my personal server (which runs multiple jails and sees more traffic than some of the servers I've worked with professionally) to 5.0 over the summer and have been building world once a month or so. Other than some short-term problems with ATAng that seem to be fixed, I haven't had any problems at all. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/qmRk5sRg+Y0CpvERAsJUAKCb3Yi/OYpDovZmmplSSBhp92rTpgCeKWQS eie1mVYwY25bavI803W9g6Y= =qaoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87ad79jzxc.fsf>