Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:43:31 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=E9czi_Szabolcs?= <szabszi@goodwill.hu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd ipsec vs. freeswan ipsex with x.509 Message-ID: <87fzc07bak.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20040322222948.GA5000@goodwill.hu> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28G=E9czi?= Szabolcs's message of "Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:29:48 %2B0100") References: <20040322194152.GB538@goodwill.hu> <87wu5c7ey2.fsf@strauser.com> <20040322222948.GA5000@goodwill.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At 2004-03-22T22:29:48Z, G=E9czi Szabolcs <szabszi@goodwill.hu> writes:
> freeswan still works for me. and I won't upgrade linux kernel to 2.6
> series. so I need solution for freeswan x509 and freebsd ipsec. is there
> any?
Well, going to freeswan.org, going to the docs for the most recent release,
clicking "Interoperating", and clicking the link saying "FreeBSD" took me
to:
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-2.05/doc/interop.html#k=
ame
There are several FAQs and HOWTOs that would seem to answer your question.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBAX2wT5sRg+Y0CpvERAv3PAKCIe73lcliUlHxb5GVW2TRqKThQwACgmrKa
npMDtgcLoA+n6aUCjoPw0wA=
=AIqQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87fzc07bak.fsf>