Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 08 May 2004 20:57:29 -0500
From:      Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS
Message-ID:  <87n04iuzue.fsf@strauser.com>
In-Reply-To: <871xlu3lk5.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> (Kai Grossjohann's message of "Sat, 08 May 2004 18:55:54 %2B0200")
References:  <871xlu3lk5.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
At 2004-05-08T16:55:54Z, Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de> writes:

> The default setup is to include /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin in $PATH.
> This means that entering "lpr -Pfoo" doesn't work for printing on my
> machine, I have to say "/usr/local/bin/lpr -Pfoo".

Is there any reason you can't delete /usr/bin/lp* and related stuff?  I
don't have lpr installed at all on my server.
-- 
Kirk Strauser

"94 outdated ports on the box,
 94 outdated ports.
 Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done,
 82 outdated ports on the box."

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAnZAJ5sRg+Y0CpvERAtdeAJ43cSOFDHO2jqAGnoZ0ad4vHKdqcACfXUOA
HDB58mZe4dXgxMv8L69nSiA=
=iYae
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87n04iuzue.fsf>