Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 17:24:21 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade -- revisited Message-ID: <87r89pwdwa.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200303021415.59947.kstewart@owt.com> (Kent Stewart's message of "Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:15:59 -0800") References: <20030302192233.GA326@willow.raggedclown.intra> <15970.24641.603055.302342@guru.mired.org> <20030302200115.GA334@willow.raggedclown.intra> <200303021415.59947.kstewart@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-03-02T22:15:59Z, Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> writes: > portupgrade -puf portupgrade > portupgrade -pufr png > portupgrade -pufr fontconfig > portupgrade -pufr libxml2 > portupgrade -pufr ghostscript-gnu Interesting. I almost always user `portupgrade -rR foo' without other options. That way, recursion works in both directions, and every package that could possibly be affected in any way by upgrading `foo' gets updated. I've been doing this for months and have never encountered a problem situation. Has anyone upgraded this way and still had trouble? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser In Googlis non est, ergo non est. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+YpKo5sRg+Y0CpvERAmcQAJ4i6GEtovTkEFPRqmfftor2a11nfQCeKb0v XIGyM1B259mMQ5P6PqAU6AE= =m9kR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87r89pwdwa.fsf>