Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:49:07 +0300 From: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@neva.vlink.ru> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4 Message-ID: <87sm3ajj8s.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> In-Reply-To: <41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> (Mathieu Arnold's message of "Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:37:23 %2B0100") References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes: Mathieu> I'm not answering to your question, but what's the need of a Mathieu> ro unionfs, a ro nullfs would do the same, no ? It seems that nullfs much slower. -- DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068@fidonet 2:550/5069@fidonet mailto:dsh@vlink.ru http://neva.vlink.ru/~dsh/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87sm3ajj8s.fsf>