Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:24:37 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd ipsec vs. freeswan ipsex with x.509 Message-ID: <87wu5c7ey2.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20040322194152.GB538@goodwill.hu> =?iso-8859-1?q?=28G=E9czi?= Szabolcs's message of "Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:41:52 %2B0100") References: <20040322194152.GB538@goodwill.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-03-22T19:41:52Z, G=E9czi Szabolcs <szabszi@goodwill.hu> writes: > is there any useful rtfm how to establish vpn connection between freebsd > ipsec gateway and linux ipsec (freeswan, x.509) gateway? How "entrenched" is the Linux host? FreeS/WAN is dead; Linux now uses the *BSD tools for IPsec. See http://www.ipsec-howto.org/t1.html for more information. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAX1mV5sRg+Y0CpvERAoYCAJ0fgZ1hl4UhjEvLwXpgo+0VMB3JWACfaTWk pccRlMwsxgMzmfdQSR6nvK0= =iKn+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87wu5c7ey2.fsf>