Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:32:19 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To:        Mike Pritchard <mpp@mpp.pro-ns.net>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Revising the rc.conf-related manpages 
Message-ID:  <887.930299539@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:22:44 EST." <199906241722.MAA16768@mpp.pro-ns.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:22:44 EST, Mike Pritchard wrote:

> I don't really like it that rc.conf.local is being taken out of the NAME
> section.  This makes it so 'whatis' rc.conf.local won't direct the user
> to this man page, and then they have to go grubbing through /etc trying
> to figure out what that file is for, instead of being pointed to this
> man page.

Well now you know why I mailed. My ruse has been foiled. :-)

My understanding is that rc.conf.local is only sourced for backward
compatibility, and isn't a meaningful part of modern FreeBSD. Is it
used for a specific purpose beyond overriding the defaults? 

If not, then I think my understanding of the situation is correct and
rc.conf is the only overriding file worth mentioning (except for the
backward compatibility clause I added).

If I'm wrong, then I'd really appreciate a little education.

Later,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?887.930299539>