Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:37:13 +0100 From: "mal content" <artifact.one@googlemail.com> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ldconfig "skipping" libraries (6.1-R) Message-ID: <8e96a0b90609081037v6325309ge48528a617c44efa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060908172817.GA27387@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0609061902410.16519@pop.ict1.everquick.net> <20060906192028.GA21278@xor.obsecurity.org> <8e96a0b90609080916q1f4d8394w2cdbf18999ad286a@mail.gmail.com> <20060908172817.GA27387@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/09/06, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:16:43PM +0100, mal content wrote: > > > Some ports do seem to use this format: > > > > $ ls /usr/local/lib | egrep '^lib.*\.so\..*\.' > > libopenal.so.0.0.8 > > libportaudio.so.0.0.18 > > $ ls /usr/X11R6/lib | egrep '^lib.*\.so\..*\.' > > libqt-mt.so.3.3 > > libqt-mt.so.3.3.5 > > libqui.so.1.0 > > libqui.so.1.0.0 > > Are they symlinks, or actual libraries? I bet the former. In this particular case: libqt-mt.so.3.3 -> libqt-mt.so.3.3.5 libqui.so.1.0 -> libqui.so.1.0.0 Both libqt-mt.so.3.3.5 and libqui.so.1.0.0 are real libraries, as are libopenal.so.0.0.8 and libportaudio.so.0.0.18. > > > Are you sure this format isn't legal? > > Quite :) If any ports are installing it, that's a bug too. > Should I send a PR? cheers, MC
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e96a0b90609081037v6325309ge48528a617c44efa>