Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:36:45 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Andrew Kenneth Milton <akm@theinternet.com.au>, Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: devfs deficiencies (was: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vinum problems?)) Message-ID: <92058.997936605@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:47:35 %2B0930." <20010816094735.F49989@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010816094735.F49989@wantadilla.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes: >On Wednesday, 15 August 2001 at 19:17:47 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108151004540.12730-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju >> lian Elischer writes: >> >>> the lack of subdirectory support is a pitty. >> >> There is support for subdirectories: >> >> ls -la /dev/fd > >What am I supposed to see there? I get three character devices, all >mounted on /dev directly. Uhm, have you forgotten how ls(1) works ? Try this then: ls -lad /dev/fd /dev/fd/[012] >In view of the fact that this thread is about deficiencies in your >devfs, this is particularly uncalled for. One of the reasons that >Julian's devfs never got debugged was that you had made it very clear >from the start that it would be removed. History being rewritten eh ? I spent 3+ years trying to argue his DEVFS should be made default! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92058.997936605>