Date: Fri, 31 Mar 95 18:00:05 METDST From: Marino Ladavac <Marino.Ladavac@aut.alcatel.at> To: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. Message-ID: <9503311601.AA02488@aut.alcatel.at> In-Reply-To: <199503311217.GAA26830@bonkers.taronga.com>; from "Peter da Silva" at Mar 31, 95 6:17 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In yet another iteration I propose: > > > Manpages etc.: Administration and Programming Reference Manual > How about just "Reference Manual"? It's not just > for programming. > > > "Advanced" docs: User Manuals and Tutorials > "User Guide and Tutorial" > > Speaking of which, where do the old "User Guides" come in any more? > IMHO, Reference Manual is a little obscure. How about: User and Reference Manual, for manpages; User Guide, for the classic guide; and Interactive User Guide and Tutorial, for the httpd stuff? I think this conveys the spirit of the packages and fits in one line. /Alby
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9503311601.AA02488>