Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 Oct 2000 23:51:41 -0700
From:      Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ext2fs support for writing - what's the verdict? 
Message-ID:  <96512.970728701@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>  of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 09:28:36 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010050916340.11864-100000@besplex.bde.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have 64K off uncommitted diffs (-c2) for ext2fs, but none for sparse
> superblocks.  This problem is easy to work around by not using
> unsupported optional features.  Run tune2fs and e2fsck under Linux to
> turn off the features (see tune2fs(8)).

That's a nice idea and may work in my particular case, but this is
also the out-of-box configuration for Red Hat and most
Linux-to-FreeBSD users wouldn't know a tune2fs if it snuck up and bit
them on the ass in broad daylight.  How hard would it be to support
sparse superblocks?

- Jordan



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96512.970728701>