Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 23:43:32 -0400 From: John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com> To: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Caraballo-vega, Jordan A." <jordancaraballo87@gmail.com> Subject: Re: bad throughput performance on multiple systems: Re: Fwd: Re: Disappointing packets-per-second performance results on a Dell,PE R530 Message-ID: <9694e9f2-daec-924d-e9f6-7b22a634acb5@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPFoGT8C1%2BZYDSFVGjCuT8v5%2B=izfXgHXEn5P2dqxAq6N6ypCA@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d349edd-0c81-2e3f-d3b9-27af232de76d@gmail.com> <20170209153409.GG41673@dwarf> <6ad029e0-86c6-af3d-8fc3-694d4bcdc683@gmail.com> <b460cc49-364a-34fb-e212-582730546dee@gmail.com> <20170312231826.GV15630@zxy.spb.ru> <74654520-b8b6-6118-2e46-902a8ea107ac@gmail.com> <CAPFoGT9k4HfDCQ7wJPDFMTrJTtDyc9uK_ma9ubneDhVSsS-jcA@mail.gmail.com> <173fffac-7ae2-786a-66c0-e9cd7ab78f44@gmail.com> <CAPFoGT-BAMpj34wtB06dxMKk%2B87OEOs5-qu%2BRLVz=aPrhX6hDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAACLuR29xQhDWATRheBaOU2vtiYp61JgDKHaXum%2BU32MBDLBzw@mail.gmail.com> <20170317100814.GN70430@zxy.spb.ru> <9924b2d5-4a72-579c-96c6-4dbdacc07c95@gmail.com> <CAPFoGT8C1%2BZYDSFVGjCuT8v5%2B=izfXgHXEn5P2dqxAq6N6ypCA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/17/2017 03:32 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:21 PM, John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes. >> We were hopeful, initially, to be able to achieve higher packet >> forwarding rates through either netmap-fwd or due to enhancements based >> off https://wiki.freebsd.org/ProjectsRoutingProposal > Have you tried netmap-fwd? I'd be interested in how that did in your tests. We have. On this particular box, (11-STABLE, netmap-fwd fresh from git) it took about 1.7m pps in, dropped 500k, and passed about 800k. I'm lead to believe that vcxl interfaces may yield better results? Thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9694e9f2-daec-924d-e9f6-7b22a634acb5>