Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:59:23 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net>, Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/pine4 Makefile (fwd) Message-ID: <97919.970300763@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> of "Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:28:41 CDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009292216140.17675-100000@achilles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That being said, I'm still finding it very difficult to rip myself away > from pine. I had considered suggesting a fork of 4.21 which would be > audited and snprintfified, but the license seems to suggest that such an > effort could only exist in the form of patches, which would be annoying. Not really - that's what the patches/ subdirectory is for. We'd simply stop making it available as a package (mark it RESTRICTED) and let pine users install it from the port. Just because getting the contents of patches/ merged back is desirable doesn't make it mandatory. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?97919.970300763>