Date: Sat, 9 May 98 23:36:02 EDT From: luoqi@watermarkgroup.com (Luoqi Chen) To: julian@whistle.com, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com Subject: Re: Soft Updates Message-ID: <9805100336.AA06453@watermarkgroup.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > > Kirk had some very good arguments but I forget what they were.. > Maybe fsck needs some special processing for softupdates after a crash? > > On Sun, 10 May 1998, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > According to Julian Elischer: > > > you need to use the -n option of tunefs on an unmounted filesystem > > > it's not a mount option.. > > > > Why not BTW ? async/noasync are mount options so one could expect > > softupdates to be the same. Is there an reason for the current scheme (not > > that I mind but it would make switch it on/off easier, especially for /). > > -- > > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #8: Tue Apr 21 02:45:53 CEST 1998 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9805100336.AA06453>