Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:57:30 +0100 From: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postgresql-performance using sysbench Message-ID: <9bbcef730801301157n25684018y3d43bfdd0301a8dd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47A0CD11.802@FreeBSD.org> References: <b41c75520801280701x35e628dk90841b55cac77045@mail.gmail.com> <200801281024.11571.darcyb@commandprompt.com> <b41c75520801281221i5fbb32f3p1e2f3be40a8dfa74@mail.gmail.com> <479E3C5E.1070405@FreeBSD.org> <b41c75520801281246q16d305ecue915e66bea6ac5ab@mail.gmail.com> <fnmrri$pi4$1@ger.gmane.org> <b41c75520801290146g4e6e2c17oe2fc432245253ba7@mail.gmail.com> <47A043FD.9090607@FreeBSD.org> <fnpjvo$n8i$1@ger.gmane.org> <47A0CD11.802@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30/01/2008, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote: > Rewrite of the lockmgr primitive, for starters. Then we'll see what > remains. Ok, I know about the lockmgr efforts, and they will surely help some loads. I'll try to compile the results I've been talking about in a few days and post them.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730801301157n25684018y3d43bfdd0301a8dd>