Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:54:45 +0200 From: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> To: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP server in base Message-ID: <AANLkTi=VJ%2BVaOOjm5KHFkReYZ0sXT3L7DfcrsA2LPt66@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C8A5CA0.1050700@feral.com> References: <AANLkTinK05bS1cojWo70exQuegus8A2=CZQb76kTEh%2BY@mail.gmail.com> <4C8A5CA0.1050700@feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/9/10 Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>: > =C2=A0I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt pack= ages at > install time, and with a modest amount of effort can install prebuilt > packages afterwards. > > IMO, such as it is, there should be *less* in the base system than there > currently is and more in ports. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > In this case there are some parts in base/ that could live in ports/ instead of the base directory such as hostapd(8), maybe nobody want to make a usable wireless access point? And what about bind too? A lot of user do not needs it, by the way there is already src.conf(5) to enable or disable modules, then a WITHOUT_DHCPD would be useful. Cheers. --=20 Demelier David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=VJ%2BVaOOjm5KHFkReYZ0sXT3L7DfcrsA2LPt66>