Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:06:55 -0700 From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: Jean-Paul Natola <jnatola@familycareintl.org>, "questions@FreeBSD.org" <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: iptables equivaelnt Message-ID: <AANLkTikmfR3LTphXoQN7bdYNridf1gUAMojjF8mIGW51@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <29017079-55A2-406B-891B-6EEB239EF730@mac.com> References: <AB2BC18AD166C948A0BC559E22CE9C9109EE7844@FCIEXCHANGE1.FCI> <29017079-55A2-406B-891B-6EEB239EF730@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> wrote: > Hi-- > > On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: >> I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables >> >> I'm particuclary trying to implement some =A0type of rate control as we = are getting hammered by spam. > > The three major choices available with FreeBSD are documented here: > > =A0http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls.ht= ml > I'd humbly suggest pf + spamd if you are concerned specifically about stopping spam, both are supported by freebsd and i have had great success using these tools to combat spam. -pete --=20 pete wright www.nycbug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikmfR3LTphXoQN7bdYNridf1gUAMojjF8mIGW51>