Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:38:48 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Peter Jeffery <peterj@mister-j.dyndns.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes Message-ID: <AANLkTikto771%2BfEP7iLqWjT=zTASa-SpeVdJFtzLWSjS@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <op.vsul9te6oxde33@pete12.mister-j.org.uk> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103192316110.84574@dee.signature.nl> <AANLkTim5Lf31sJH634sb976xDsekg53jQmvenYcuR9dq@mail.gmail.com> <op.vsslnf05oxde33@pete01.gateway.2wire.net> <4D8A2A79.4010908@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTikNC0ET6CcOvHHJnvZwxaLpxpyVKBHt77jRo_Xm@mail.gmail.com> <op.vsul9te6oxde33@pete12.mister-j.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main > location based on what categories My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full directory tree of symlinks for the "secondary" categories. > I'm sure that something like this has been mentioned before. But I don't see > what else is going to stop > the categorization issue popping up all of the time. If we alphabetized the ports then there would be constant conversation about how whether or not we should categorize them. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikto771%2BfEP7iLqWjT=zTASa-SpeVdJFtzLWSjS>