Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:47:46 -0600 From: "Jason J. W. Williams" <jasonjwwilliams@gmail.com> To: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] ZFS v15 patch (version 3) Message-ID: <AF7CFEEA-75A6-4AD5-BD5E-CCD33CEAC14E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C357F0A.70009@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C31C71C.2010606@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTilPv4ujPjfexMQpEYZ7buk7oWwSS5B1l14Wjl0K@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinYeQtiCRSrLt6GAcrOcumugvPREizRrugXY5-0@mail.gmail.com> <4C357F0A.70009@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Martin, If you're using it for NFS then that can be a good feature, but I see a lot m= ore folks complaining about lack of removal for log devices.=20 We've been using ZFS on OpenSolaris for DB servers since 2006 and OpenSolari= s bits are very stable. In most cases we've found ZFS under OSol to be more s= table than Solaris. Normally this is due to the youth of ZFS and the speed w= ith which bugs are being corrected...which end up in OSol while Solaris lang= uishes under it's long release cycle. I'll posit Joyent as an example here o= f the stability of OSol bits...they use the SXCE distro recently discontinue= d.=20 v19 also includes a number of performance fixes for DB workloads.=20 -J Sent via iPhone Is your e-mail Premiere? On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:32, Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > User and group quotas is no important enhancement? >=20 > We have to see the whole thing from a stability perspective as well - > OpenSolaris has by far less testing than Solaris 10. > Oracle cannot afford to feed his enterprise customers (and these are not > few) with untested code. >=20 > D=C5=88a 7. 7. 2010 20:30, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote / nap=C3=ADsal(a): >> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jason J. W. Williams >> <jasonjwwilliams@gmail.com> wrote: >>=20 >>> If the target is FreeBSD 9 instead of 8.1, why not merge ZFS v19? 15 >>> really doesn't give any major enhancements over 14 and FreeBSD 9 isn't >>> coming out any time. >>>=20 >>> 19 would give much need log device removal and triple parity RAID-Z. >>> Both of which are well tested at this point via OpenSolaris. >>>=20 >>>=20 >> these are very valid points, but I am not sure that anyone has zfs v19 pa= tches >>=20 >>=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AF7CFEEA-75A6-4AD5-BD5E-CCD33CEAC14E>