Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:04:28 +0200 From: "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org> To: Ingo Flaschberger <if@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing enhancement - reduce routing table locking Message-ID: <BANLkTik39HvVire6Hzi9U6J2BwKV7apCCg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1104180051450.8693@filebunker.xip.at> References: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1104050303140.2152@filebunker.xip.at> <alpine.LRH.2.00.1104061426350.2152@filebunker.xip.at> <alpine.LRH.2.00.1104180051450.8693@filebunker.xip.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It would be great to see flowtable going back to its intended use. However, I would be surprised if this actually scales to Mpps. I don't have any high end hardware at the moment to test, what is the highest packet rate you've seen? i.e. simply generating small packets. Thanks On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Ingo Flaschberger <if@freebsd.org> wrote: > > attached a new version of this patch with some improvements and bug-fixes= . > Test-Reports are welcome. > > Kind regards, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Ingo Flaschberger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTik39HvVire6Hzi9U6J2BwKV7apCCg>