Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:23:13 -0700 From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TLS on ARM and MIPS Message-ID: <BE64B52D-B1BA-4107-8D14-D4FAF2C62350@canonware.com> In-Reply-To: <4F7A170E.8020209@bluezbox.com> References: <2FF97057-905D-4F02-9138-75680ABC6202@canonware.com> <4F79F020.9070504@freebsd.org> <3C11DB18-1C43-446E-A0BC-FC15C6126819@canonware.com> <4F7A170E.8020209@bluezbox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 2, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: > On 02/04/2012 1:31 PM, Jason Evans wrote: >>=20 >> Can we remove the NO_TLS definitions in src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c? = I can't test the result, of course=85 >=20 > How do I test it? Will running buildword on MIPS device with > these changes be sufficient? Or do we have specific tests for it? I typically two two rounds of buildworld/installworld/reboot to make = sure that the newly installed toolchain still works. This paranoia is = mainly to catch problems with static binaries, which won't change in = this case, so one round is probably enough. Jason=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BE64B52D-B1BA-4107-8D14-D4FAF2C62350>