Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:56:10 -0800
From:      Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PATCH: add ATF tests in sys
Message-ID:  <C2E6F1D5-B409-4F2E-B856-C65473BCC3A0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2iiSH9DvE73_7V=A%2ByqObROmvJu7VRTMG7K74eMtHk4=g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOtMX2iiSH9DvE73_7V=A%2ByqObROmvJu7VRTMG7K74eMtHk4=g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Jan 21, 2014, at 14:45, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> I rewrote the unix seqpacket tests in ATF.  The hard part is adding
> them to the build.  The linked patch adds them in the directory
> sys/kern/tests and builds them as part of buildworld, not buildkernel.
> They get installed to /usr/tests/sys/kern, but the intermediate
> objects are stored in /usr/obj/sys/kern/tests.  That means that you
> can't have different tests associated with different kernel configs.
> I think that this is desirable, because you wouldn't be able to
> install tests for different kernel configs anyway, given our chosen
> layout of /usr/tests.
>=20
> Please comment on the parts of this patch that deal with Makefiles.
> Is this the appropriate way to add sys tests to the build?  Shouldn't
> I be building them in buildkernel instead of buildworld?  I couldn't
> find a good way to do that.

I bypassed that for simplicity and placed the tests in tests/sys/kern/... et=
c. Shoehorning things into our overly complex kernel build system just seems=
 like a really bad idea... Just make it load as a driver, loadable, and depe=
ndent on kern.features to run..?
Cheers!
-Garrett=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C2E6F1D5-B409-4F2E-B856-C65473BCC3A0>