Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:20:51 +0000 From: Eric Joyner <ricera10@gmail.com> To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, "Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CURRENT: net/igb broken Message-ID: <CA%2Bb0zg_GzedJ%2BSv4p_R%2Bra6KqJauMNn1MKTuxhc6tfWHszfzvQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55FC40CB.7090504@freebsd.org> References: <20150915125618.0f752596@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <55F7FCB5.5090809@selasky.org> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D65688077F87B@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150917133509.6c87f5b6@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <20150917133712.0ffd01ee@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <55FC40CB.7090504@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
He has an i210 -- he would want to revert e1000_i210.[ch], too. Sorry for the thrash Sean -- it sounds like it would be a good idea for you should revert this patch, and Jeff and I can go look at trying these shared code updates and igb changes internally again. We at Intel really could've done a better job of making sure these changes worked across a wider variety of devices. - Eric On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > r287762 broke the system > > > Before I revert this changeset *again* can you test revert r287762 from > if_igb.c, e1000_82575.c and e1000_82575.h *only* > > That narrows down the change quite a bit. > > sean > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bb0zg_GzedJ%2BSv4p_R%2Bra6KqJauMNn1MKTuxhc6tfWHszfzvQ>