Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:10:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> To: Dylan Leigh <fbsd@dylanleigh.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No more free space after upgrading to 10.1 and zpool upgrade Message-ID: <CA%2Bq%2BTcoC4gTPqGc_V3xv%2BcWxJuB2r8YioH_NLfaj=5xwsaXW0w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20141116080128.GA20042@exhan.dylanleigh.net> References: <CA%2Bq%2BTcqo2CL%2B00-4RTD1=WStOSYtawwsZbC1tpZ1G9CbiBp_Dw@mail.gmail.com> <20141116080128.GA20042@exhan.dylanleigh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Dylan Leigh <fbsd@dylanleigh.net> wrote: > > Could you provide some other details about the pool structure/config, > including the output of "zpool status"? > > It's a raidz1 pool build with 5 SATA 2TB drives, and there are 5 zvolumes without advanced features (no compression, no snapshot, no de-dup, etc...). Because it's a raidz1 pool, I know that FREE space reported by a "zpool list" include redundancy overhead and is bigger than AVAIL space reported by a "zfs list". I've moved about 100GB (on hundred GigaByte) of files and after this step there were only 2GB (two GigaByte) of Free space only: How is it possible ? About the zpool status: pool: storage state: ONLINE scan: scrub in progress since Sun Nov 16 07:58:54 2014 4,28T scanned out of 8,78T at 1/s, (scan is slow, no estimated time) 0 repaired, 48,80% done config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM storage ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada0p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada1p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada2p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada3p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 gptid/7ef9b7e4-fc4c-11e1-b75e-009c029758a0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTcoC4gTPqGc_V3xv%2BcWxJuB2r8YioH_NLfaj=5xwsaXW0w>