Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 May 2015 07:47:27 +0100
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@rabson.org>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        freebsd current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,  =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@freebsd.org>,  David.Boyd49@twc.com
Subject:   Re: nmount, mountd drops high order MNT_xx flags during a mount update
Message-ID:  <CACA0VUj=ZEK3PCxaaus_ZjmSMdCXJ=67ppc_HjY53D8LH2JZmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1588878108.33116674.1430961004678.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>
References:  <1588878108.33116674.1430961004678.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You could add a single integer-valued vfsopt which holds the high-order
bits of f_flags?

On 7 May 2015 at 02:10, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> David Boyd reported a problem to freebsd-current@ w.r.t. the
> MNT_AUTOMOUNTED
> flag getting cleared by mountd.
>   http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1429477202.29812.38.camel
> I just took a look at this and it's kinda ugly...
>
> mountd acquires a list of mounts via getmntinfo() and then does an
> nmount() for each of them to get rid of any exports. It uses
> f_flags from the statfs returned by getmntinfo() as the 3rd
> argument to nmount().
> --> Since nmount()s 3rd argument is a "int", it silently drops any
>     MNT_xx flag in the high order 32bits of f_flags. At this time,
>     it happens that MNT_AUTOMOUNTED is the only one, but...
>
> I can think of a couple of ways to fix this, but I don't like any of
> them;-)
>
> 1) I suppose mountd could check for each flag set in f_flags and generate
> a vfsopts string for it, but that means that every time a new flag that
> can be updated is added to MNT_xx, this mountd.c code would have to
> updated.
> --> Ugly!!
>
> 2) Require that all flags in MNT_UPDATEMASK be in the low order 32bits.
>    I wouldn`t mind this except in means that the MNT_xx flags must be
> redefined
>    and I don`t think that could get MFC`d.
>
> 3) Add a new newernmount(2) which has a 64bit flags argument instead of
> int.
>
> Hopefully someone can think of a nice way to fix this, rick
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACA0VUj=ZEK3PCxaaus_ZjmSMdCXJ=67ppc_HjY53D8LH2JZmg>