Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:20:13 -0800 From: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> To: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nomenclature for conf files Message-ID: <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> wrote: > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > WITH_KMS=YES > WITH_KMS="YES" > WITH_KMS=yes With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not. In general, from my experience, only the second one will work. This might, or might not, be true for other uses, but rc.conf is pretty picky about this. Kurthelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ>