Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:04:32 +0200 From: Spil Oss <spil.oss@gmail.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Subject: Re: Problems with ipfw/natd and axe(4) Message-ID: <CAEJyAvP-4FZ7eZ0o4c3qMzC0nY_gT4GfS3KjBVQiuzNY3aXz4Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130415160625.K56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <CAEJyAvOZ6fW0i3yT_D4fH1huje-qsJwA7GGeXqAO1PKzge-YNw@mail.gmail.com> <20130415015850.Y56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAHu1Y73Xu64NY1B=idaKmHKDGOB3AHbcXKi4A48-SNkhJrMy6Q@mail.gmail.com> <20130415160625.K56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Hi all,
Network dumps as promised
On 172.17.2.1:
tcpdump -p -i bridge0 -s 0 -w ssh-fail.pcap host not 172.17.2.167
>From 172.17.2.1 I ran
telnet 172.17.2.111/157 22
In Wireshark I trimmed the capture a bit further with expression
'not stp and not http'
Initial setup (ue0 ext, re0 int, rule 10 to allow ssh)
-> ue0-ssh-success.pcap
Removed rule 10
-> ue0-ssh-fail.pcap
Switched re0 and ue0, default ruleset (without 10)
-> re0-ssh-success.pcap
According to YungHyeong the sample ASIX NIC he has works normally when
checksumming is disabled.
Kind regards,
Spil.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:34:06 -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
> wrote:
> >
> > > 'allow ip' aka 'allow all' doesn't usually take a port number, which
> > > applies only to tcp and udp.
> >
> > It does in ipfw - in which case it means ( udp | tcp )
>
> You're quite right, and my assumption that it would also permit icmp
> was quite wrong, after a quick test.
>
> Which appears to leave the bypassed divert not working with rx/txcsum
> the only viable suspect. The ruleset is otherwise 'out of the box'.
>
> Does anyone know whether this is an issue with libalias(3) generally -
> in which case using nat instead of divert shouldn't help - or just with
> natd in particular?
>
> cheers, Ian
>
[-- Attachment #2 --]
ò HlQZS J J `nB[Sf E <*@ @o5 tY `
w HlQ@Z J J f `nB[S E <