Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:18:42 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: irc/xchat: limit icon blinking time Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnnDknX6=QN6jUpGLx1CeG6jHCn8CkcaCrXap0dYJO2og@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FE566CB.406@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FE2315C.50706@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxg=W=QhJ0%2BLJ_pudZmJo5yTWoWQj77NWKjWXx1sP1pLzbw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE2F673.2080201@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgme9QoKKrictteBaipGKDq5ZTycL9d6_f2X4XVYNgyQFQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FE518FB.1000802@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgneJR0ObpPTnX0EX7T82cbYRA5gq_66_qYAeqOaQqUQGw@mail.gmail.com> <4FE566CB.406@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 June 2012 23:48, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 06/22/2012 20:14, Eitan Adler wrote: >> I don't oppose build patches for FreeBSD when the program otherwise >> works, but the ports collection is not a software development >> repository. > > There are a non-trivial number of examples to the contrary. Such as? > Not to > mention that there is actually no reason for us not to have our own > stuff in ports. Our own stuff is completely unrelated. The question at hand is do we continue development of third party software by means of patches to the ports tree? -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnnDknX6=QN6jUpGLx1CeG6jHCn8CkcaCrXap0dYJO2og>