Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:00:56 -0400 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav_Zeman?= <vhaisman@gmail.com> Cc: rank1seeker@gmail.com, Reid Linnemann <linnemannr@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /bin/sh => STDIN & functions, var scope messing Message-ID: <CAFMmRNz8p4t=PEstsy5itKYPUiJzo5_48L9sJWQxWjWrXcpDmg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKw7uVjty2cJXT_QmexxKdRQyiKoHYMK1E-TjSHa5TCX1S8Bbg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130527.194235.693.1@DOMY-PC> <CA%2B0MdpOcz7aw03HCrbxZVt1cnWdR4shqWaEfBrQkCpPnbgXLPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKw7uVjty2cJXT_QmexxKdRQyiKoHYMK1E-TjSHa5TCX1S8Bbg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Václav Zeman <vhaisman@gmail.com> wrote: > Curious. Which of the two behaviours is POSIXly correct? > I believe that /bin/sh's behaviour is correct. I don't know what shell the manpage is referring to, but it's not bash (bash does the same thing in a pipeline). Perhaps it's referring to csh? If that is the case that line is probably causing more confusion rather than alleviating it.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNz8p4t=PEstsy5itKYPUiJzo5_48L9sJWQxWjWrXcpDmg>