Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:30:45 +0100 From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> To: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements Message-ID: <CAFYkXjk8LgrYAm6iTtiAkrHKWcGDFij-7H9j1dgj305KemaOhw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121225151532.GA1404@faust.sbb.rs> References: <20121225151532.GA1404@faust.sbb.rs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I always considered FreeBSD to be the most unabiguous, straightforward and sometimes even raw, but still extremely powerful and innovative, operating system out there. Seeing 9.1-RELEASE instead 9.1-PRERELASE or 9.1-RC4 is also a bad suprise for me... I have fallback into RC3 and I think the RELEASE files should be removed as well because there was no RELEASE yet. There is no rush to get RELEASE, I am sure it is better to get RC4, RC5, RC6 and then a RELEASE "when its ready". When people get buggy and unstable RELEASE and install it on a production systems they will neither come back to the system nor even support it in future :-( -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjk8LgrYAm6iTtiAkrHKWcGDFij-7H9j1dgj305KemaOhw>