Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:16 -0700
From:      "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>,  Andrea Brancatelli <abrancatelli@schema31.it>, =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= <elferdo@gmail.com>,  freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11
Message-ID:  <CAHM0Q_O4HwdUHZs6963XsJ5_nAXqvuPczOw4of47cSP5N74vuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160831133642.GA25574@lonesome.com>
References:  <20160822120215.GV22212@zxy.spb.ru> <20160823110159.GU18643@e-new.0x20.net> <20160824045558.18c86764@X220.alogt.com> <3234db29c228879cc473deec0b09568c@schema31.it> <CAMwkeZwmhqL%2BOU4kWafMOw6gCZB1N3Zxw5n-TyJ57R_toGM1Eg@mail.gmail.com> <20160826132059.63c23ee5@X220.alogt.com> <20160828060601.08ea91a8@X220.alogt.com> <CAMwkeZzeQk6tL_fG7TJdFCt_4CWPADNaHy2VP4yEs3Mm2F77MA@mail.gmail.com> <20160830074656.18bfaf05@X220.alogt.com> <CAHM0Q_Oh9%2BPzXji5t58tx6hUmM-gt_CweC%2BEGBENw23kxtzwvA@mail.gmail.com> <20160831133642.GA25574@lonesome.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:

> I'll demur just a bit on your points.
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a prebuilt package does that
> > just fine),
>
> Well, yes, for a tier-1 machine; and one that is connected to the network.
>
> > I can't speak for the whole universe of users, but I think it's safe
> > to say that most users are not power users who individually configure
> > ports tailored to their needs.
>
> We've certainly tried to provide a migration path away from that, but I
> don't think anyone has statistics about how far along we are.  IMHO we
> can't assume it's 100%, or maybe even 80%.
>
> > I think my experiences on Ubuntu [...] are illustrative.
>
> A number of years ago Ubuntu and FreeBSD had barely overlapping audiences:
> end-users and developers.  With all the improvements to pkg and tier-1
> packages I hope that is changing -- the goal of expanding the reach is
> why I supported all the changes I saw being made.
>
> But for me an attraction has always been "you can build it out of the box",
> even if I rarely do it (e.g. I am not working in the kernel/driver area),
>
> mcl
>

Can clang actually bootstrap from something like lcc? As far as I can tell
you need a fairly advanced C++ compiler just to build that compiler in src
- which already needs to be installed. It's not exactly bootstrapping from
Bourne shell. So I'm not sure "it's self-hosting" is even true, not to
mention that you needed a network connection to get src in the first place.
Thus the whole argument strikes me as circular if not outright deceptive.

-M



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHM0Q_O4HwdUHZs6963XsJ5_nAXqvuPczOw4of47cSP5N74vuQ>