Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:20:04 -0500 From: Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> To: "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd or linux Message-ID: <CAHieY7Ru_6BAJpwzxGLm4_EBDj3qJk=2_ZYjN__7-G6AAOmi2g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <efacbaca245398375b8994ddb37c3534.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> References: <mailman.4254.1544437045.5224.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <efacbaca245398375b8994ddb37c3534.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:08 PM James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, December 9, 2018 20:13, The Doctor wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >> ?? Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:18:50 +0330 > >> mehdi <mehdideveloper1370@gmail.com> ??????????: > >> > >> > hi > >> > > >> > what the diffrent freebsd and linux? > >> > > >> > thanks > >> > > >> FreeBSD is Operating System. > >> Linux is kernel. > > > > FreeBSD uses a 4.4BSD Kernel NOT a LinSuck kernel! > > > > What is this? The troll before Christmas? > > > LOL. Along those lines... why did NeXT then-to-be OS X decide on Mach ? Anybody know the history on this? I have always wondered 1) who decided to use FreeBSD as the base OS (I'm guessing the licensing played a big part of the decision) , 2) Why Mach, 3) Why Objective C. Not that I agree or disagree with the choices just curious if the story of how/who chose these things for NeXT and if this story ever went public anywhere... Best, Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHieY7Ru_6BAJpwzxGLm4_EBDj3qJk=2_ZYjN__7-G6AAOmi2g>