Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:24:47 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /tmp filesystem full Message-ID: <CAHu1Y72OdQqxEeehj_ST1pCa4_3QPiT3PqNej4m-psn22bEu2w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120823031754.0b52bed6@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <201208221934.q7MJYfwM063804@mail.r-bonomi.com> <1345664911.2501.8.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> <CAHu1Y72xwNevgKQ8eVYYOzGC80-511DtDe8kJMWbYJm5Tq28CA@mail.gmail.com> <20120822232112.07ac3517@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120822232907.34fc82fc@gumby.homeunix.com> <CAHu1Y71Y_cxv_qgQaMmzdx5kZHtXGuLGaxx9QQAE8QBWGL3fUA@mail.gmail.com> <20120823031754.0b52bed6@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:17 PM, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> wrote: > tmpfs and "swap" md devices don't actually need swap. I don't seen any > advantage in your way of creating an md device for /tmp. Then you don't understand. ;-) The advantage of my approach is avoiding a kernel panic when writing to the tmpfs when you haven't pre-allocated all the filesystem space at creation time. If that happens to matter to you...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y72OdQqxEeehj_ST1pCa4_3QPiT3PqNej4m-psn22bEu2w>