Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:49:10 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru> Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Strange results of TP-Link WDR3600 wired ethernet performace test Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokyYVPmsY9BU=tRV6zYWweqsECwmYexv_mMpbFob%2ByjRw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <562E5D17.7030700@rdtc.ru> References: <562E44E9.8090605@grosbein.net> <562E5D17.7030700@rdtc.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I'm glad that the throughput is higher - I was expecting exactly that. The interrupt storm - not sure. I haven't reproduced that at home. There's some bit(s) in the interrupt status register that don't seem to be cleared by taking action. I don't know what they are yet. We don't yet have hardware NAT acceleration in our stack. Someone has to write it. :-) -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokyYVPmsY9BU=tRV6zYWweqsECwmYexv_mMpbFob%2ByjRw>