Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:43:14 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Graham Todd <gtodd@bellanet.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: rcs Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomGRuXGKzJ8sGVVNZLpecStbizJywi6XV8PCSF2u9fZVA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310081527250.1964@wawanesa.iciti.ca> References: <60177810-8DC4-4EA3-8040-A834B79039D2@orthanc.ca> <52538EDC.2080001@freebsd.org> <52541202.3010707@mu.org> <20131008.170444.74714516.sthaug@nethelp.no> <525422B6.9040906@mu.org> <CAJ-Vmonj4Vs35ZCE0%2B=cvyR9ZYgu%2B%2BWo0c6EmqtD=dmHLeCe2A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310081527250.1964@wawanesa.iciti.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've iterated my views on these things a few times. I honestly am not all _that_ interested in trying to build a polished OS. I'd rather participate in building an OS toolkit that let's PCBSD, pfsense, "that storage appliance I keep forgetting the name of (heh)", etc all build OSes on top of it. I'm hoping that some group will take FreeBSD-<nowish> as 10.x and later evolves, combines it with pkgng and some package development policies, and rolls OSes that people actually want to use and deploy. I don't mind if that's called pc-bsd. I'd be running pcbsd right now if it were doing drops against -head. I believe this may be happening soon. Just saying.. :-) -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomGRuXGKzJ8sGVVNZLpecStbizJywi6XV8PCSF2u9fZVA>