Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 May 2016 16:41:50 -0300
From:      Luiz Otavio O Souza <loos.br@gmail.com>
To:        Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, dfleuriot@hi-media.com, Luiz Otavio O Souza <loos@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 10.3-STABLE - PF - possible regression in pf.conf set timeout interval
Message-ID:  <CAJ8CS7rxi6QW2CnA11tGgfRrbHY4O2LQLQsVxvEG618-r_3MeQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <62ABBFDC-8662-48E5-A624-EAE609CDCBD0@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CAE63ME4gNys9i_BnvFXw27QupTwQQomGGVnuiGQrza7jsQ_27A@mail.gmail.com> <62ABBFDC-8662-48E5-A624-EAE609CDCBD0@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Kristof Provost wrote:
>
>> On 09 May 2016, at 16:58, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> Since the upgrade, pf rules won't load anymore at boot time, nor even
>> manually with pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf :
>> # pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
>> /etc/pf.conf:24: syntax error
>> pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded
>>
>> The problematic line is :
>> set timeout interval 10
>>
> I think that was broken by the commit which added ALTQ support for CoDel.
>
> It made =E2=80=98interval=E2=80=99 a keyword, and it looks like that brea=
ks things for you.
>
> I=E2=80=99ve cced       loos so he can take a look.

Damien,

I was AFK in the past couple days, I'll look at this tonight.

Luiz



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ8CS7rxi6QW2CnA11tGgfRrbHY4O2LQLQsVxvEG618-r_3MeQ>