Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:33:29 -0700 From: mdf@FreeBSD.org To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas Message-ID: <CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAGH67wRxehY4fZPOd1hqXkBffOrSvh4ujYw6XeqVj_VsWdDsaQ@mail.gmail.com> <j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>> right? >> >> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. > > Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot > froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". This message implies the memory affinity information coming from ACPI is either non-sensical, or you have an unexpected physical setup where there really are CPUs with no memory in the local sockets. You should be able to boot with something like hint.srat.0="disabled" at the boot loader prompt. Thanks, matthew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ>