Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:02:01 -0600 From: "Samuel J. Greear" <sjg@evilcode.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alie Tan <alie@affle.com> Subject: Re: DragonFly vs FreeBSD scheduler Message-ID: <CANY-Wm_xkdVdyPi7xvfYAV%2B_YMWbyrgJnh2Q4V2s_7PiyjFxBw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <509531DF.6050108@mu.org> References: <CANuCnH9b20NxDpmzPdE2tdEFCTx7a4u_TvvEJNc0J4yCbDm%2Biw@mail.gmail.com> <509531DF.6050108@mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Looks like a few specific benchmarks that DragonFly aimed to do well at that > we were unawares of. > Unawares of? http://bsd.slashdot.org/story/08/03/06/1313218/freebsd-70-bests-linux-in-smp-performance The FreeBSD project made hay with sysbench and pgbench not that long ago. > Not sure, didn't see DragonFly sharing the results with us until this paper > was published although I may have missed that. > Is the DragonFly project under some obligation to share its results with the FreeBSD developers? > -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANY-Wm_xkdVdyPi7xvfYAV%2B_YMWbyrgJnh2Q4V2s_7PiyjFxBw>