Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:03:37 -0700
From:      Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To:        Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Cc:        freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Abdullah Tariq <ab.tariq90@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help
Message-ID:  <CAOjFWZ7uAPJ3EaoLktQ%2BBVTBt7LrKjmhK0FpCY6X3u%2B0YWYGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5AE75988.3020306@grosbein.net>
References:  <CAPFxuwQOBkGTHZbGfJz=-fUW8M%2BQGOpTM9T%2B-RO6H4fWcGEtqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPFxuwSEDTNhfn1%2B1nXPAC6skJt%2BdAych10FN9bwwBVdqevO2w@mail.gmail.com> <5AE33513.1000001@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwRceDDoTw-4EohRdjUMSE-YN4YKWhbObuvEpxzEWOh2_A@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34754.6040905@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ5TwZnnW%2B1TT7urq_0pgb=sM_VwH4x0eq0363MCdb7hw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34CFA.7000207@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwR54nPiKAAACRY5a_GvDNOVfdniqv6F_3PK4--7vm03uA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE437C1.8010706@grosbein.net> <CAFZYVy7_nVm5G1XDdM_TujN=jVbCyDEKABGbC=M9L5Lh1jAAzQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AE44ADD.7020302@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ=Gi7GiVr%2BsdTavr6r44ftaeFDOvN7%2B3qi_7aZyH6kXw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE468D5.9030702@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwRdLrEmtVHGSruja6L-bcOi0Z59ae5mB1gWgi-PvU6inw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ6m=j6aY7nbeppCK9TTAJ1P%2BfN7Hs5sZ3CfWc7Ad4v_cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ62BQ3WZVvpZ0D9UJFcV4stXm-prE=GDp-JconSktQzpA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE4D1AC.3080702@grosbein.net> <CAOjFWZ7AchG8HEvURSNGXGeqYiYaSn4Uo=rBgGoFqLAbAdOMJw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE75988.3020306@grosbein.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
wrote:

> 30.04.2018 23:46, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> > What the OP is trying to do is have PC1 send untagged packets to igb0 o=
n
> FreeBSD which is configured for tagged vlan 5.
> > Then bridge the packets to igb1 which is also configured for tagged vla=
n
> 5.  Then send the packets out, untagged, to PC2.
>
> Why would one want to "configure igb0 for tagged vlan 5" when igb0
> supposed to receive untagged frames?
> This does not make any sense. One should just bridge igb0 as is, without
> creation vlan on it and problem's solved.
>

=E2=80=8BYes, agree.  What the OP wants to do can't be done.  :)=E2=80=8B


--=20
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOjFWZ7uAPJ3EaoLktQ%2BBVTBt7LrKjmhK0FpCY6X3u%2B0YWYGGQ>