Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:10:36 -0500 From: "C J Michaels" <cjm2@earthling.net> To: "Greg Prosser" <greg@straynet.com> Cc: <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: dropping 127.* on the floor Message-ID: <CDEJIONOMGKHCNHBALKPAEJICAAA.cjm2@earthling.net> In-Reply-To: <20020204100307.F12914-100000@voyager.straynet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Greg Prosser Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:07 AM Subject: Re: dropping 127.* on the floor > > <...snip...> > According to the squid FAQ[1], they recommend using ipfw fwd rules > diverting traffic to 127.0.0.1 to transparently insert the cache server. > This behaviour is now broken, as ipfw rewrites the packet before it hits > the network stack, as does ipf, and both end up dropped. I've tested and > confirmed this on 4.5-STABLE, the rules in the FAQ did not work for me. Does squid's transparent proxying depending upon the packet being forwarded to the loopback? or can we just re-write the rule to push it down one of the other interfaces? > > -gnp > > [1] squid FAQ URL: http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-17.html#ss17.8 --Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CDEJIONOMGKHCNHBALKPAEJICAAA.cjm2>