Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1998 14:52:10 -0500 From: Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: Studded <Studded@gorean.org>, Marc Gutschner <Marc.Gutschner@triplan.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable? Message-ID: <E0zRiaA-0004wG-00@spawn.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <199810091911.MAA12445@rip.psg.com> References: <361DEC25.30065DCC@Triplan.COM> <361E3DE4.39F057F4@gorean.org> <199810091757.KAA10402@rip.psg.com> <361E4FE8.2EF1B5DA@gorean.org> <199810091845.LAA11689@rip.psg.com> <361E5F28.1DE06387@gorean.org> <199810091911.MAA12445@rip.psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I don't see anything obvious that should make this happen... presumably xntpd uses adjtime or ntp_adjtime, and those use the normal superuser check routine ``suser'', which doesn't distinguish between different security levels. Randy, can you run ``truss ntpdate yada yada yada'' so we can see which system call is returning EPERM? Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org On 9 October 1998 at 12:11, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: > >> xntpd gives me the analogous message. i am at security level 2. > > Well that's probably it then. :) > > i.e. one can not run ntp at security level 2? should i like this? > > randy > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNh5pajeRhT8JRySpAQGQiQQAs2eF5b00Jg4kgCRxO2dwYn5X88ANWSUA eKjKPT89rRjpdInPqCHJ5Y1ddAnyzQ0AlBMIOXYQfGMmBU4z7vOw9OwkNxxoy4fA 2b9+gpV9mw9vCbaz/jXFE5+hawwbj6t+mXdk+zuB8BR1F1SZw9t/rHm/+XRljQyB JMl8Fm0qSbw= =l8BL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0zRiaA-0004wG-00>