Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Sep 2016 17:16:23 +0200
From:      Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [ZFS] refquota is very slow !
Message-ID:  <EDDE17FC-1B3A-4912-B93C-08E18433A4C9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1524067530.1937.a66cb17f-9141-4bef-b758-5bb129d16681.open-xchange@ox.internetx.com>
References:  <D559DE69-A535-427C-A401-1458C2AA8C31@gmail.com> <1472914773423.63807@kuleuven.be> <0E828163-AEAB-4C8C-BFCF-93D42B3DB3B6@gmail.com> <1524067530.1937.a66cb17f-9141-4bef-b758-5bb129d16681.open-xchange@ox.internetx.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Same kind of results with a single local (SSD) disk based pool, refquota takes much more time than quota around the limit.

Here is the output for this single disk based pool :
zfs get all   : http://pastebin.com/raw/TScgy0ps
zdb           : http://pastebin.com/raw/BxmQ4xNx
zpool get all : http://pastebin.com/raw/XugMbydy

Thank you !

Ben


> On 04 Sep 2016, at 13:42, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter <juergen.gotteswinter@internetx.com> wrote:
> 
> Did you try the same in a single local disk based pool? And pls post output of
> zfs get all, zdb & zpool get all
> 
> 
>> Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com> hat am 4. September 2016 um 11:28
>> geschrieben:
>> 
>> 
>> Juergen & Bram,
>> 
>> Thank you for your feedback.
>> 
>> I then investigated further and think I found the root cause.
>> 
>> No issue with refquota in my zroot pool containing (in this example) 300.000
>> inodes used.
>> 
>> However, refquota is terribly slow in my data pool containing around
>> 12.000.000 inodes used.
>> 
>> I then created 12.000.000 empty file in my zroot pool, in a test dataset.
>> I put a refquota on this dataset and created a dd file to fulfil empty space.
>> And around the limit, it began to stall...
>> I then created an empty dataset in the same pool, refquota is even slow in
>> this dataset having no inode used.
>> The root cause seems then to be the total number of inodes used in the pool...
>> 
>> Some numbers :
>> Time to fulfil 512MB with quota : 17s
>> Time to fulfil 512MB with refquota : 3m35s
>> 
>> Very strange.
>> 
>> Do you experience the same thing ?
>> 
>> Thank you again,
>> 
>> Ben
>> 
>>> On 03 Sep 2016, at 16:59, Bram Vandoren <bram.vandoren@kuleuven.be> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I encountered the same problem over NFS. I didn't manage to reproduce it not
>>> using NFS. I think the userquota property works without any problem though.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bram.
>> 
>>> On 03 Sep 2016, at 12:26, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter
>>> <juergen.gotteswinter@internetx.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> cant confirm this, works like a charm without difference to normal quota
>>> setting
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EDDE17FC-1B3A-4912-B93C-08E18433A4C9>