Date: Sun, 21 May 1995 00:49:28 +0400 (MSD) From: "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.hb.north.de>, Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Changed information for PR misc/409 Message-ID: <PRONbllyk2@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <9505201915.AA06222@cs.weber.edu>; from Terry Lambert at Sat, 20 May 95 13:15:54 MDT References: <9505201915.AA06222@cs.weber.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <9505201915.AA06222@cs.weber.edu> Terry Lambert writes: >It's a vi/bash/elvis bug. The ks/ke is not supposed to be destructive, >it's supposed to allow an application to distinguish the keypad and >non-keypad characters with the same keycaps (in the case of the PC, >when numlock is on). 1) It isn't a bug, read man 5 termcap about ks/ke, your ks/ke interpretation is wrong. 2) Those ks/ke comes from original VT100 which don't have any additional keypad expect PF1-PF4, so it forced to use numeric keypad. Since xterm emulates VT family, it preserve this historycal cruft. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?PRONbllyk2>