Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 May 1999 15:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BitKeeper (was Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051505450.15293-100000@pez.hyperreal.org>
In-Reply-To: <21787.925610260@zippy.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 1 May 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> My suggestion would be to wait and see how bitkeeper pans out.  Enough
> people in the Linux camp have already looked at CVSup and gone "ooh,
> sexy!"  that I think there will already be significant pressure to
> develop similar tools for the bitkeeper environment.  When that
> happens, we can start to look at this more seriously.

I think that's wise.

I'd also recommend people check out Bitkeeper's license before making any
final decisions.  It's not GPL, BSD, or any other Open Source license.  

	Brian




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051505450.15293-100000>